2020. 1. 26. 23:51ㆍ카테고리 없음
Create and use groups in your EndNote Library; Use Cite While You Write to insert and manage in-text citations and reference list entries in Word. Duration: 1 hour. EndNote for Mac. Are you a Mac user and would like to learn how to use the popular bibliographic management software EndNote? This workshop will show you how to use EndNote on a Mac.
Click to expand.That is App Expose within Mission Control. App Expose from the desktop shows the entirety of all the App windows in a grid layout. App Expose from Mission Control just slightly shifts the Windows. They still cover each other and sometimes completely hide each other. This is a huge problem if you want to move a window from one space to another. For example, say you have 4-5 finder windows open to various locations and you want to move the folder with you pictures to a space with Adobe Photoshop - you will not be able to find the finder window to move.
It is a pain and poorly thought out. Maybe if you only use your computer for a few e-mails and web browsing it doesn't matter, but 10.4 through 10.6 made complicated things easy.
Mission Control makes complicated things needlessly complicated. Click to expand.Don't forget to set up the library proxy for Papers. That way you can not only search for papers, but also download the.pdf directly. Papers2 added a lot of functionality in terms of autofilling the article information, like vol. But they re-wrote the whole program from the ground up for Papers2 some features are still being re-implemented, like search tokens.
It would be worthwhile to ask for a Papers1 license until they fix the search tokens, otherwise searching doesn't narrow down things very well. Right now I have 8 Desktops.
Because it's the only way to be able to SEE my Safari windows in each one when I spread them out because this only shows a few windows and they're STILL overlapped/messy. When I do 'app expose' (which I set to a hot corner) - I see ALL my Safari windows in a grid. The problem is. They are teensy windows that I can barely make out and I have a 27' iMac 2.
It shows ALL my windows and I have no idea which Desktop (Space) they are in. Doesn't matter - they can't be moved from there anyway. I wonder why they didn't create a nice simple grid view available for each Desktop vs showing a grid for ALL desktop windows in total.
That is App Expose within Mission Control. App Expose from the desktop shows the entirety of all the App windows in a grid layout. App Expose from Mission Control just slightly shifts the Windows. They still cover each other and sometimes completely hide each other. This is a huge problem if you want to move a window from one space to another. For example, say you have 4-5 finder windows open to various locations and you want to move the folder with you pictures to a space with Adobe Photoshop - you will not be able to find the finder window to move.
It is a pain and poorly thought out. Maybe if you only use your computer for a few e-mails and web browsing it doesn't matter, but 10.4 through 10.6 made complicated things easy. Mission Control makes complicated things needlessly complicated.
Csu Library On Twitter: Don't Forget About Our Endnote For Mac Download
Click to expand.Did you even read what was written? The way it scrolls in MC is different than how it scrolls outside of it. How do I expect 3 finger scrolling to work? BECAUSE IT DOES WORK. Use the OS before you start criticizing other people. If you set page swipes to 3 fingers it makes space swaps become 4 finger swipes, and then all of the gesture swipes work again in iTunes, Chrome, Finder etc. It's idiotic that Apple released their software and only one of their programs was coded to work with two finger-swipes.
1) In Sente 6, keywords are words or phrases attached to references by external data sources (PubMed, Web of Knowledge, JSTOR, etc.). Tags are words or phrases assigned to references by the Sente user. 2) In Sente 6, tags can either be created and assigned “on-the fly” by simply typing new values into the appropriate field in the reference editor, or assigned from the new QuickTag palette. 3) Tags in the QuickTag palette can be organized hierarchically. That is, one can organize QuickTags into categories that nest arbitrarily deep.
Note that this is different from many tagging systems that do not permit nesting of tags. For many people, it will be most efficient to work with tags using the QuickTag palette window.
This window displays the entire hierarchy of QuickTags and shows which tags have been assigned to the currently selected reference(s). Toggling tags in this window will assign or remove a tag from the selected reference(s), which makes it easy to assign tags to many references at once. In Sente 6, tags can be used in Smart Collection definitions and Sente automatically creates a hierarchy of built-in smart collections matching the QuickTag hierarchy, so you can easily see all the references that include any particular tag. One thing to note about the QuickTag hierarchy is that if a reference is tagged with a tag several levels down in the hierarchy, it behaves as thought it is tagged with all of the parents of that tag. For example, if the QuickTag list included a category called “Bicycles” with sub-categories of “Mountain Bikes” and “Road Bikes”, any reference tagged with “Mountain Bikes” would be included whenever references tagged with “Bicycles” are displayed. And these “implied” tags are evaluated on-the-fly, so if you were to change the hierarchy, the new structure would be used when determining which references should be included.
The practical benefit of applying this tagging hierarchy over the long–term in your main Sente Library is obvious: you will eventually be able to draw connections between many different sources. The best practice for tagging is to try to develop some basic tags in your QT ontology first, though this takes more work early on, and try to make these autopopulate the tags in the tag window of the reference editor. Here is an example of an ontology I made, which needs to be re-designed, but will give a general impression of what’s possible. To design or not to design a complex QT Ontology?
This has inspired some spirited discussions amongst Sente users, and the simple answer is that there is no one uniform sort of complex QT ontology, but many possible sorts, and moreover, that different users with different interests, fields, and methodologies, will make use of this in different ways. My main point here is to merely point you in the direction of those discussions which you can browse on the Sente forum:. Stay tuned for future posts!
This entry was posted in on.